Becky Haugen, Author at Law Offices of David P. Sheldon

Annie Morgan to Present Oral Argument Before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Posted on February 24, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Annie Morgan to Present Oral Argument Before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in SrA Bryce Roan’s Case

Washington, D.C. – On Wednesday, February 26, 2025 Senior Trial and Appellate Attorney Annie Morgan of the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC, will present oral argument before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) in the case of Senior Airman (SrA) Bryce Roan. The argument will focus on the government’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence, violating SrA Roan’s constitutional and statutory rights to a fair trial under Brady v. Maryland and Rule for Courts-Martial 701.

SrA Roan was convicted of wrongful use of cocaine following a positive urinalysis during a unit-wide drug sweep. However, critical evidence indicating the possibility of a false positive due to a pre-workout supplement was withheld by military prosecutors. This evidence was later disclosed in a separate but related court-martial, where Roan’s roommate was acquitted of the same offense. Despite clear indications of gross negligence by investigators—including the destruction of key investigative records—the government proceeded with Roan’s prosecution without full disclosure of exculpatory evidence.

CAAF granted review on the following issues:

Whether the lower court erred in finding that the withheld evidence was immaterial, thereby violating the principles established in Brady v. Maryland.
Whether the government’s failure to disclose evidence violated SrA Roan’s rights under Rule for Courts-Martial 701.

“The failure to disclose exculpatory evidence is an affront to every service member’s right to a fair trial,” said Annie Morgan, who will argue the case on behalf of SrA Roan. “This case is about more than one Airman—it is about ensuring integrity in military justice. We will not stop fighting until justice prevails.”

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC, a nationally recognized military law firm based in Washington, D.C., continues to champion the rights of service members in complex court-martial cases and appeals.

For more information, please contact:

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC
100 M St SE, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20003
www.militarydefense.com

Disclaimer:

The information provided in this press release is for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. Service members facing legal or administrative challenges should consult with a qualified attorney who is experienced in military law to receive guidance tailored to their specific circumstances.

The Removal of Top JAG Officers: How Political Interference Undermines Military Justice

Posted on February 24, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

The Removal of Top JAG Officers: How Political Interference Undermines Military Justice

The recent dismissal of high-ranking military officers, including top Judge Advocate General (JAG) officials, by the current administration has raised significant concerns about the integrity of the military justice system and the potential for unlawful command influence.

Chain of Command and the Role of JAG Officers

In the U.S. military, the chain of command is a foundational principle that ensures order, discipline, and effective decision-making. JAG officers serve as the principal legal advisors within this structure, providing commanders with essential counsel on military justice, operational law, and other legal matters. Their expertise is crucial for maintaining the rule of law within the armed forces and ensuring that military operations comply with domestic and international legal standards.

Legal Framework Governing Removal of JAG Officers

The President, as Commander-in-Chief, holds the authority to appoint and remove senior military leaders, including JAG officers. However, such actions are traditionally exercised with caution to preserve the apolitical nature of the military and to maintain stability within its ranks. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military regulations do not explicitly restrict the President’s power to remove these officials. Nonetheless, abrupt or politically motivated dismissals can undermine the perception of impartiality and fairness that is vital to the military justice system.

Unlawful Command Influence and Its Implications

Unlawful command influence (UCI) occurs when senior military or civilian leaders improperly interfere with the military justice process, potentially swaying the outcome of judicial proceedings. The UCMJ explicitly prohibits such influence under Article 37, emphasizing the need for an independent and impartial military justice system. The recent firings, particularly if perceived as politically motivated, may constitute UCI by instilling fear or bias among remaining personnel, thereby compromising the fairness of legal proceedings.

Impact on Military Justice

The removal of experienced JAG officers and the insertion of individuals perceived as loyalists can have several detrimental effects:

Erosion of Legal Expertise: Seasoned JAG officers possess a deep understanding of military law and its applications. Their sudden removal can lead to a loss of institutional knowledge, adversely affecting the quality of legal advice provided to commanders.
Perception of Bias: Introducing personnel with perceived political affiliations into key legal positions can undermine the credibility of the military justice system, leading service members and the public to question the impartiality of legal proceedings.
Deterrence of Candid Counsel: JAG officers must feel secure in offering honest and sometimes critical legal advice. A climate of fear, stemming from the potential for unwarranted dismissal, may deter them from providing unvarnished counsel, thereby impairing decision-making at the highest levels.

Conclusion

While the President possesses the authority to remove and appoint senior military officials, the recent actions concerning top JAG officers raise profound concerns about the potential for unlawful command influence and the overall integrity of the military justice system. Maintaining an independent and apolitical legal advisory corps within the military is essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure justice is administered fairly and without prejudice.

About The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC is a premier military and federal law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of service members, veterans, and federal employees. With decades of experience in military justice, administrative law, and security clearance matters, the firm provides aggressive legal representation in courts-martial, discharge upgrades, and appeals. David P. Sheldon and his team are committed to ensuring fairness, due process, and the rule of law within the military and federal systems.

For more information, visit www.militarydefense.com or contact the firm for a consultation.

Disclaimer:

The information provided in this article is for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. Service members facing legal or administrative challenges should consult with a qualified attorney who is experienced in military law to receive guidance tailored to their specific circumstances.

Veteran Files Federal Lawsuit to Correct Military Records for Denial of Earned Combat Honors and Benefits

Posted on February 21, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Veteran Challenges Army’s Denial of Earned Honors and Benefits in Federal Court

Washington, D.C. – The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, P.L.L.C., announced today that a federal lawsuit has been filed challenging the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records’ refusal to award a decorated U.S. Army veteran full medical retirement, back pay, and well-earned honors for combat service. Attorney Dylan Thayer, of the Washington, D.C.-based firm, is representing the plaintiff in this case, which seeks to correct unjust decisions made regarding his military record and disability benefits.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, argues that the Army improperly denied the plaintiff the Combat Action Badge and the Purple Heart, despite clear evidence of combat injuries and engagement with enemy forces. The legal action also challenges the Army’s decision to discharge the plaintiff with a partial disability severance rather than granting full medical retirement.

“Our client has given years of honorable service to his country and has suffered significant, documented combat injuries,” said Dylan Thayer. “The Army Board’s refusal to grant him the recognition and compensation he rightfully deserves is both unjust and inconsistent with the law. This lawsuit seeks to correct these wrongs and ensure that his sacrifices are properly honored.”

The complaint asserts that the Army’s denial was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to military regulations. Despite overwhelming medical and service records supporting the plaintiff’s claims, the Board refused to amend his records or provide the benefits to which he is entitled.

“The Army’s decision contradicts its own regulations and policies,” said Thayer. “We are confident that the court will recognize the injustice in this case and direct the Army to rectify these errors.”

This lawsuit is part of a broader effort by The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon to advocate for veterans who have been denied benefits through wrongful injustices and denial of the law.

For further information or media inquiries, please contact:

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, P.L.L.C.
100 M Street, S.E., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20003
Phone: 202-546-9575
militarydefense.com

Disclaimer:

Fighting for Federal Workers: A Legal Perspective on Unjust Job Loss

Posted on February 20, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Fighting for Federal Workers: A Legal Perspective on Unjust Job Loss

A Crisis for Federal Workers

Imagine dedicating years of service to your country, only to find yourself jobless overnight, without warning or justification. This isn’t a hypothetical situation—it’s happening right now to Veterans and military personnel in federal jobs across the country. Positions are being slashed, and the cuts often ignore the legal rights designed to protect these dedicated employees. The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon is stepping in to help workers challenge these unfair actions and fight for their futures.

Understanding Your Rights as a Federal Employee

Many federal employees don’t realize they have strong legal protections that prevent arbitrary terminations. These rights come from important laws, including:

Title 5 of the U.S. Code – Ensures due process before termination.
Veterans Employment Opportunities Act (VEOA) – Protects Veterans from unfair hiring and firing practices.
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) – Allows federal employees to appeal wrongful terminations.
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) – Shields workers who report government misconduct from retaliation.

How the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon Can Help

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon has built a strong reputation for fighting for federal employees, ensuring their rights are upheld when faced with job loss. Here’s how they help:

Challenging Unjust Terminations

Investigating whether job cuts followed proper legal procedures.
Filing appeals with the MSPB.
Negotiating reinstatements or financial settlements.

Protecting Veterans’ Rights

Ensuring that Veterans’ Preference rules are followed.
Filing complaints with the Department of Labor.
Seeking reinstatement or compensation when rights are violated.

Defending Against Retaliation and Discrimination

Standing up for employees facing retaliation for whistleblowing.
Fighting discrimination against disabled Veterans under USERRA.
Ensuring fair treatment in the federal workplace.

Appealing Unfair Job Cuts

Preparing grievances and appeals.
Challenging improper reductions in force (RIF).
Filing injunctions to stop wrongful dismissals.

What You Can Do Right Now

If you’ve lost your federal job unfairly, you are not powerless. Here’s what you should do:

Get Everything in Writing – Request an official explanation for your termination.
Act Fast on Appeals – You typically have 30 days to file an MSPB appeal.
Enforce Your Veteran Status – If you’re a Veteran, file a claim with VETS within 60 days.
Seek Legal Help – Contact an experienced federal employment lawyer.
Keep Records – Maintain documentation of all communications and notices regarding your termination.

Conclusion

The unauthorized termination of federal employees—especially Veterans—is not just unfair; it’s illegal. The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon is committed to helping those who have served their country and now find themselves fighting for their livelihoods. If you or someone you know is facing an unjust removal, don’t wait—seek legal counsel and stand up for your rights.

For expert legal representation in federal employment disputes, contact the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon today.

Disclaimer:

Dylan Thayer to Argue Before D.C. Circuit in Major Coleman’s Case Against the U.S. Air Force

Posted on February 20, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Dylan Thayer to Argue Before D.C. Circuit in Major Coleman’s Case Against the U.S. Air Force

Washington, D.C. – February 20, 2025 – Attorney Dylan Thayer will present oral arguments before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on February 21, 2025, at 9:30 A.M., advocating for Major Thomas G. Coleman (ret.), USAF, in his case against Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall, III.

Major Coleman seeks to rectify a bureaucratic error that has unjustly prevented him from completing his 18-year safe harbor period for military retirement. The Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) acknowledged the error but has failed to fully remedy its consequences. At issue is whether a military correction board, upon identifying an injustice, is required under the law of the D.C. Circuit to fully correct that injustice. Thayer will argue that the answer is unequivocally yes.

In his appeal, Major Coleman is requesting 49 days of constructive service credit to compensate for the eight to 14 months of service time he was wrongfully deprived due to Air Force administrative failures in processing his waiver and transfer request between 2012 and 2013. Despite meeting all requirements to make the year count toward his retirement, the Air Force’s error prevented him from earning the necessary 50 points for a complete year. While the AFBCMR has previously made minor adjustments, it has never fully corrected the injustice, leaving Major Coleman without the retirement protections he rightfully earned.

Thayer will emphasize that when a military correction board acknowledges an error, it is legally obligated to restore the service member to the position they would have been in but for the mistake. This case carries significant implications for service members who rely on correction boards to ensure fairness in military records and retirement eligibility.

Oral arguments will take place at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and is listed on the court’s website: www.cadc.uscourts.gov.

Disclaimer:

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC Files Lawsuit Against U.S. Air Force Over Delayed Wrongful Death Claim

Posted on February 17, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC Files Federal Lawsuit Against U.S. Air Force Officials Over Unreasonable Delay in Wrongful Death Claim

Washington, D.C. – February 17, 2025 – The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of Shawn Bogen, a widow seeking justice after the tragic drowning of her husband, Andrew Bogen, at a Department of the Navy-managed swimming facility in Japan.

The lawsuit, filed against senior officials of the United States Air Force, including Chief of the Foreign Torts and Litigation Branch, Stephen J. Eriksson, and Acting Secretary of the Air Force, Gary A. Ashworth, challenges the agency’s failure to take timely action on Ms. Bogen’s wrongful death claim under the Military Claims Act (MCA).

Mr. Bogen, a civilian Department of Defense Education Activity teacher, drowned at the Purdy Fitness Center Pool in Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan, on August 29, 2022. Despite visible distress, on-duty lifeguards failed to respond promptly, resulting in his untimely death.

Ms. Bogen initially filed her claim under the MCA in November 2023, yet the Air Force has refused to either approve or deny the claim, instead insisting that she first pursue a separate claim under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA)—despite clear legal precedent demonstrating that FECA does not apply in this case.

“The government’s refusal to take action on Mrs. Bogen’s claims is not just an administrative failure—it is an injustice,” said Dylan Thayer, lead counsel for the plaintiff. “By unlawfully withholding and unreasonably delaying a decision, the Air Force is denying a grieving widow the closure and compensation she is legally entitled to.”

The lawsuit, brought under the Mandamus Act (28 U.S.C. § 1361) and the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706(1)), seeks a court order compelling the Air Force to take immediate action on Ms. Bogen’s claims and provide the justice she and her family deserve.

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC remains committed to holding military and government agencies accountable and ensuring fair treatment for service members, federal employees, and their families.

For more information, please contact:

David P. Sheldon
Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC
100 M Street, S.E., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20003
Phone: (202) 546-9575
Website: www.militarydefense.com

Disclaimer:

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon Advocates for Amendment to SB93 to Expand Tax Benefits for Uniformed Services Retirees

Posted on February 17, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon Advocates for Fair Tax Treatment of All Uniformed Service Retirees in Montana

Washington, D.C. – The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, a leading firm in military and veteran legal advocacy, is actively supporting an amendment to Montana Senate Bill 93 (SB93) to ensure that all uniformed service retirees, including those from the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Corps, receive equitable tax benefits.

Currently, SB93 provides a partial tax exemption on retirement income for military retirees who meet specific residency requirements. However, the bill excludes retired members of the USPHS and NOAA Corps, despite their official classification as part of the United States Uniformed Services under 10 U.S.C. 101.

Proposed Amendment to SB93

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon is advocating for a critical amendment to:

Expand eligibility to include all uniformed services as defined by federal law.

Modify SB93’s language to reflect the full scope of eligible retirees, including USPHS and NOAA Corps personnel.

Remove the five-year limitation and extend the benefits permanently beyond 2033.

Why This Matters

The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps (USPHS) has served Montana and the nation for over a century, leading public health initiatives, emergency responses, and critical healthcare services—especially in underserved communities. Despite this, USPHS retirees remain excluded from Montana’s proposed tax relief, even though they receive the same pay and benefits as their military counterparts.

Montana residents can take action now by urging their legislators to support the amendment. A one-page fact sheet with key details about SB93’s requested changes is available.

How You Can Help

✔ Contact Montana state legislators and request their support for the SB93 amendment.
✔ Use our pre-drafted email template to easily reach out to your representatives [insert link].
✔ Spread the word on social media using #SB93 and tagging relevant policymakers.

About the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon is a nationally recognized firm specializing in military law, veterans’ rights, and administrative advocacy. With decades of experience fighting for service members and their families, our firm remains committed to securing justice and fair treatment for those who have served.

For media inquiries or legal assistance, please contact:

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC
MilitaryDefense.com
202-546-9575

Disclaimer:

Annie Morgan on Military Justice & Women in the Armed Forces – Dog Tag Diaries Podcast

Posted on February 12, 2025February 19, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Guest Appearance by Annie Morgan on the Dog Tag Diaries Podcast to Discuss Military Justice and Defending High Value Detainees at Guantanamo Bay

Washington, D.C. – February 12, 2025 – The Dog Tags Podcast, hosted by Captain Kim and Captain Dakota, features a powerful new episode with special guest Annie Morgan, Senior Military Defense Attorney at the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. Known for her fierce advocacy for service members and extensive work in military justice, Morgan shares her insights on legal challenges within the military, her experiences representing detainees at Guantanamo Bay, and the ongoing push for military justice.

Dog Tag Diaries, hosted by Captain Kim and Captain Dakota, has become a trusted platform for sharing authentic stories of experiences in the military—particularly those highlighting the voices and experiences of women in service. This episode adds another meaningful conversation to their growing library of compelling content.

Episode Highlights Include:

Annie Morgan’s work as military attorney for detainees at Guantanamo Bay
Defending military members and her commitment to justice for the military community
The importance improving conditions for women in the armed forces
Her own experiences of being part of the military community from childhood to now a Senior Military Attorney for the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon

Where to Listen:
The Dog Tag Diaries Podcast is available on Dog Tag Diaries. Don’t miss this episode featuring Annie Morgan and other inspiring voices from women in the military community. “Join Captain Kim as she explores Annie’s experiences defending airmen and navigating the intricacies of criminal justice.”

Lawsuit Filed Against Department of Defense for Medical Negligence and Procedural Violations

Posted on February 7, 2025March 25, 2025 by Becky Haugen

Complaint Filed Against Department of Defense Alleging Medical Negligence and Violations of Procedural Rights

Washington, DC – The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon have filed a federal complaint on behalf of the father of a deceased U.S. Navy seaman, alleging severe medical negligence by the medical staff aboard the USS Ronald Reagan and significant violations of due process by the Department of Defense.

The complaint asserts that the seaman, who tragically passed away in 2016, was denied proper medical care over a six-day period despite showing increasingly severe symptoms of illness. Medical personnel allegedly ignored protocol and failed to administer necessary diagnostic tests, resulting in the preventable death of a young service member.

“This case highlights a profound failure of care and accountability,” said Dylan Thayer, an attorney with the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “No family should ever experience such a tragic loss due to negligence, nor should they be denied justice by procedural errors and misapplications of the law.”

The complaint further alleges that after the independent autopsy revealed the true cause of death, the Department of Defense repeatedly misrepresented the circumstances surrounding the seaman’s passing. Efforts by the family to seek justice were met with denials and procedural barriers, including an improper refusal to apply the discovery rule to determine the timeliness of the claim.

“We are committed to ensuring that this family’s voice is heard and that those responsible are held accountable,” Thayer added. “This lawsuit is about more than just one individual case—it’s about exposing a broader issue and preventing future injustices.”

The lawsuit seeks judicial review of the Defense Health Agency’s denial of the family’s claim, arguing that the agency’s actions were arbitrary, capricious, and in violation of constitutional and statutory rights.

About the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon
The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon are dedicated to representing military service members and their families in matters involving military justice, medical negligence, and appeals. With extensive experience in military law, the firm is known for its tireless advocacy and pursuit of justice for those who serve.

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon
202-546-9575
militarydefense.com

Disclaimer: